From Change Plan to Behavior Change
Diagnose why adoption fails, then design the conditions that make the new behaviors easier to do.
This course helps you diagnose why the new behavior is not happening and what needs to change around the work.
Taught by Robert Meza — Founder, Aim For Behavior
Grounded in behavioral and implementation science. Built for the realities of organizational change.
Enrollment opens soon: the waitlist gets the date first.
- FormatSelf-paced
- Core teaching~3–3.75 hrs
- Applied workVaries by initiative
- Toolkit11 tools (9 core + bonus + capstone)
- Worked caseOne case, worked end to end
- Final outputAdoption Conditions Brief
Team access available for 5 seats. Talk to us
The problem
Most change work fails at the behavior level
When people don't adopt the new process or tool it is very easy to say they are resistant, however, I think a lot of the time resistance is a weak diagnosis, because what looks like resistance may also be telling us something important about the culture, and the conditions for change. The symptom is not the same as the root cause, and so the issue behind the resistance may be that the new way of working doesnt fit the reality of the job or that it removes autonomy without replacing it with something useful.
It didn’t stick.
The initiative launched, but the new way of working never became normal.
We trained people and nothing changed.
Knowledge increased, but behavior in the work did not.
Adoption is uneven.
Some teams changed quickly. Others stalled, worked around it, or quietly reverted.
We don’t know what to change first.
There are too many theories, too many activities, and too little clarity on leverage.
What you will build
Adoption Conditions Brief
By the end of the course, you will produce an Adoption Conditions Brief for a real change initiative: a sponsor-ready synthesis of the target and current behavior, actor system, diagnosis, leadership and culture conditions, adoption conditions design, measurement and sustainment, and recommended next move.
| Change initiative | What change are you briefing? |
|---|---|
| Business outcome | What outcome should improve later? |
| Target behavior | Actor + action + context + quality marker. |
| Current behavior | What do they do today instead? |
| Actor system | Who shapes whether the behavior happens? |
| Diagnosis | What is the strongest current explanation? |
| Leadership and culture | What sponsor, manager, and culture signals should change? |
| Adoption conditions design | Which binding conditions should change around the work? |
| Measurement and sustainment | What will be measured, and what happens when the signal turns amber? |
| Recommended next move | What decision, operating move, or evidence is needed next? |
Look inside the brief
Preview three pages from the final Adoption Conditions Brief: its ten-section structure, the blank measurement page, and that page completed in the Meridian illustrative composite.
-
How ten sections become three jobs
This page groups the ten sections into three jobs: frame the work, explain the system, and prove and decide.
View full-size page -
The blank measurement and sustainment page
The blank page shows the fields learners complete for the behavior indicator, observable states, truth anchor, ownership, governance, and amber action.
View full-size page -
The same page completed in the Meridian illustrative composite
The Meridian illustrative composite shows a completed measurement page with evidence-linked entries, explicit governance, and a restrained amber action.
View full-size page
Meridian is an illustrative composite. It demonstrates the method and the discipline of evidence-linked completion; it is not a client result.
You leave with your own brief, built from the tools and evidence in your initiative.
What you will learn
From a vague goal to designed adoption conditions
Three moves, from framing the behavior to sustaining it. The full module detail sits in the syllabus further down.
Frame the behavior
- Frame the Change ProblemWhat is the real behavior-change problem?
- Specify the BehaviorWho needs to do what, where, and when?
- Map Actors and StakeholdersWho shapes, blocks, enables, reinforces, or performs the behavior?
Diagnose adoption
- Diagnose Readiness and BarriersWhat is stopping the behavior from happening?
- Leadership: Sponsor + ManagerWhat sponsor and manager behaviors shape whether the new behavior gets adopted?
- Culture & NormsWhat cultural signals make the old behavior legitimate and the new behavior unsafe?
Design and measure
- Design Adoption ConditionsWhat needs to change around the behavior for adoption to happen?
- Measure and SustainHow will we know behavior is changing and staying changed?
- Capstone: Adoption Conditions BriefCan you do this on a real initiative?
The toolkit
Tools you fill in, not slides you file away
Every module pairs with a tool you apply to the worked case and then to your own initiative. Each tool ships as a worksheet with methodology notes and a fully worked example.
Change Problem Framing Canvas
Turns a vague change goal into a specific behavioral problem statement.
ABC Behavior Specification Canvas
Pins down who needs to do what, where, and when.. before anyone designs anything.
Stakeholder / Actor System Map
Maps the actor system, then identifies the two or three stakeholders whose engagement most affects adoption.
Readiness & Barrier Diagnostic
Tests capability, opportunity and workflow, motivation, readiness, capacity, and priorities, then ranks the evidence-backed barrier hypotheses.
Sponsor Behavior Contract
Converts “leadership support” into named, observable sponsor behaviors.
Manager Activation Sheet
Does the same for line managers.. the people who make or break daily adoption.
Culture & Norms Scan
Surfaces the cultural signals that keep the old behavior legitimate.
Adoption Conditions Map
Designs the response.. matched to the diagnosed barrier, at the right level.
KBI & Sustainment Chain
Defines the behavioral indicators under your KPIs and the sustainment loop that keeps change alive — including the Three-Signal Framework, distinguishing doing it, not doing it, and faking it.
Stakeholder Engagement Diagnostic
A deeper engagement diagnostic for complex stakeholder systems.
Capstone Brief
The integrating deliverable: your Adoption Conditions Brief template.
Stop relaunching. Start diagnosing.
Join the waitlist and I will let you know when the course opens.
Join the waitlistThe method underneath
The method underneath
The course is organized around a practical 7-step adoption workflow: frame the change problem, specify the behavior, map actors and stakeholders, diagnose readiness and barriers, identify leadership and culture gaps, design adoption conditions, and measure and sustain. Underneath it sits the SHIFT method (Specify, Hypothesize, Intervene, Facilitate, Test) and established behavioral science.
- Specify
- Hypothesize
- Intervene
- Facilitate
- Test
Operational course workflow
- Frame the change problem
- Specify the behavior
- Map actors and stakeholders
- Diagnose readiness and barriers
- Identify leadership, culture, and condition gaps
- Design adoption conditions
- Measure and sustain behavior change
Who is behind this
Who is behind this
Robert Meza
Founder, Aim For Behavior
Robert Meza is a behavioral scientist and the founder of Aim For Behavior, a behavioral science consultancy that helps organizations make change happen in real work. The course distils the diagnostic approach AFB uses in consulting engagements. The same diagnosis-before-solution discipline, packaged so practitioners can run it themselves.
I built this course after working and applying change for different organizations and seeing the gaps they needed to fill.
Behavioral science, applied to adoption
Behavior changes when the conditions around it change
Change the system default
At Penn Medicine, changing the EHR prescribing default from opt-in to opt-out increased generic prescribing from 75.4% to 98.4%. The 98.4% rate held across 30 months and 2,599,045 post-change prescriptions.
Olshan, Rareshide & Patel (2019), Journal of General Internal Medicine; quasi-experimental health-system study.Make the desired action automatic
At a large US corporation, automatic 401(k) enrollment increased participation among employees in tenure months 3-15 from 37% to 86%. Many employees also stayed with the default contribution rate and fund, showing why defaults must be designed carefully.
Madrian & Shea (2001), Quarterly Journal of Economics; administrative employer comparison.Build accountability into the workflow
Across 47 primary care practices, accountable justification reduced inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by 7.0 percentage points and peer comparison by 5.2 points relative to control trends. Suggested alternatives alone did not significantly change the trajectory (P = .66).
Meeker et al. (2016), JAMA; cluster-randomized clinical trial.These studies show how defaults, workflow design, and accountability changed behavior in specific organizational settings. They are not tactics to copy unchanged or promises of course outcomes. The EHR result came from a single-system quasi-experimental study; Madrian and Shea also found default anchoring; Meeker studied prescribing in US primary care.
Who it is for
Built for people responsible for making change land
This course is designed for practitioners already involved in organizational change, transformation, adoption, implementation, or capability-building work.
The worked case
One case, worked end to end
Meridian Bank: a mid-size regional commercial bank rolling out a new credit decisioning platform. 150 relationship managers, 25 credit analysts, training done, dashboards green, and the real work still happening in Excel and email. Every module applies its tool to this case before you apply it to your own.
Meridian Bank is a fully worked, bank-realistic illustrative composite built for teaching. It is not a real client engagement.
Full syllabus
Every unit, in order
-
Intro Course Intro 9–11 min
How does the adoption workflow fit together?
Orientation to the 7-step adoption workflow and the SHIFT method underneath it.. how the modules, tools, and case connect.
-
M1 Frame the Change Problem 16–18 min
What is the real behavior-change problem?
Distinguish between initiatives, outcomes, attitudes, and behaviors.. and turn broad goals like “drive adoption” into a workable problem statement.
-
M2 Specify the Behavior 17–22 min
Who needs to do what, where, and when?
Specify the target behavior using Actor–Behavior–Context logic. Without a specific behavior, diagnosis goes vague and interventions default to generic solutions.
-
M3 Map Actors and Stakeholders 18–23 min
Who shapes, blocks, enables, reinforces, or performs the behavior?
Look beyond the end user. Adoption depends on a stakeholder system.. sponsors, managers, influencers, gatekeepers, champions, blockers, and bystanders.
-
M4 Diagnose Readiness and Barriers 18–23 min
What is stopping the behavior from happening?
Diagnose readiness and barriers before choosing interventions.. combining a practical behavioral lens with organizational readiness.
-
M5a Leadership: Sponsor + Manager 20–25 min
What sponsor and manager behaviors shape whether the new behavior gets adopted?
Leadership support is not a message.. it is a pattern of behavior. Translate “sponsorship” into observable sponsor and manager behaviors.
-
M5b Culture & Norms 19–24 min
What cultural signals make the old behavior legitimate and the new behavior unsafe?
Culture is visible in what people expect, support, reward, punish, tolerate, and repeat. Translate “culture change” into observable signals.
-
M6 Design Adoption Conditions 18–23 min
What needs to change around the behavior for adoption to happen?
Design adoption conditions instead of defaulting to generic communication, training, or pressure.. choosing strategies that match the diagnosis.
-
M7 Measure and Sustain 20–25 min
How will we know behavior is changing and staying changed?
Measure adoption as behavior, not just activity, sentiment, or rollout completion.. with a simple KBI chain connecting leading indicators to outcomes.
-
Capstone Capstone: Adoption Conditions Brief 18–22 min
Can you do this on a real initiative?
Integrate everything into a short, sponsor-ready Adoption Conditions Brief on your own change case.
What is included
Format and access
10 focused teaching units
Course Intro, seven numbered modules (with Module 5 split into two teaching units), and a capstone: ten teaching units in total. The revised teaching scripts total approximately 3 to 3 hours 40 minutes.
A worked case from start to finish
Meridian Bank.. a fully worked, bank-realistic illustrative case threaded through every module, so you see each tool applied before you use it on your own initiative.
11 practical tools
Nine core tools, a bonus stakeholder engagement diagnostic, and the capstone Adoption Conditions Brief. Each includes a learner worksheet and a worked Meridian example.
A capstone you can use at work
You finish by producing an Adoption Conditions Brief on a real initiative: a sponsor-ready synthesis of the behavior, the system around it, the design response, and the measurement loop.
Licensing, facilitated delivery, or capability programs for your organization
Book a callQuestions, answered
Questions, answered
Who is this course for?
How long does it take?
Is it theoretical or practical?
Can my team take it together?
Can our organization license it?
What tools are included?
How does access work?
How is this different from ADKAR / Kotter?
Is this another change-management framework?
Diagnose the barriers, then design the conditions, so you can enable change
Join the waitlist and be first to know when the course opens.
Join the waitlist