Skip to main content
Aim For BehaviorContact
Menu

Organizational change · consumer goods company

Friction after an organizational restructure

Which meeting and feedback practices were getting in the way of productive work after the restructure?

Target behavior

More effective meeting and feedback practices across teams adapting to a new structure.

Colleagues meeting in a glass-walled Amsterdam office.

Project questionWhich meeting and feedback practices were getting in the way of productive work after the restructure?

Which meeting and feedback practices were getting in the way of productive work after the restructure?

Feedback and meeting practices were getting in the way of productivity and wellbeing after an organizational restructure.

The useful reframe

A broad concern about organizational efficiency became two observable parts of work: how meetings were run and how feedback moved between people.

The work

From question to something a team could use.

Project work identified meetings and feedback as focus areas, used mixed-method analysis, designed two pilots, and evaluated them with participant feedback.

  1. 01

    Choose the focus areas

    Workshops, desk research, and internal material were used to identify meetings and feedback as the two priority areas.

  2. 02

    Analyze the current pattern

    Mixed methods were used to examine existing behavior and the barriers affecting communication and meeting management.

  3. 03

    Pilot and review

    Two pilot programs were designed around the diagnosed conditions, then reviewed through participant feedback on effectiveness, acceptability, and improvement needs.

Capabilities used

Move from a broad organizational concern to bounded pilots and review.

01

Behavioral scoping

“Efficiency” was too broad to design for. Meetings and feedback made the concern observable.

02

Organizational diagnosis

Workshops and internal material established the setting; desk research and mixed methods helped identify the conditions affecting practice.

03

Pilot design

Two bounded responses were designed around the diagnosed barriers.

04

Implementation feedback

Participants were asked about effectiveness, acceptability, and what should change. That evidence gave the team something more useful than a launch/no-launch verdict.

What the project produced

  • Focus-area diagnosis
  • Mixed-method behavioral analysis
  • Two pilot programs
  • Participant-feedback evaluation

Evidence

Two pilots, reviewed with participants.

Documented
The design of two pilots and participant feedback on effectiveness, acceptability, and improvements.
Measurement scope
Independent changes in productivity, wellbeing, or time use.

Next case · Tourism · city destination

A route beyond the obvious visitor sites

A city wanted visitors to spend time around lesser-known cultural sites and support nearby businesses.

Read the next case